Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.................. ............................Originally Posted by labmonkey
Then why did you vote for option #4? If you voted that you don't care, why did you post that you didn't know?
Yes, I knew that SFG75's review was on the Gold line.
No, I thought it was on the Silver line.
I had no idea which he was talking about.
I don't care which he was talking about.
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.................. ............................Originally Posted by labmonkey
Then why did you vote for option #4? If you voted that you don't care, why did you post that you didn't know?
You SNOB youOriginally Posted by cigarsarge
Sarge only likes stinky old Havanas, these inexpensive domestics aren't worth his time worrying about
![]()
After going back and reading the review, I have to say I had no idea which line he was talking about. IMO I feel if you are going to post a review about a certain cigar you need to be very specific about the "line" you are reviewing. As a newbie myself, I would never had known whether you were referring to the Silver or the Gold. If you check on Cigar International, they refer to both the Gold line and the Silver line as having Torpedo's............. Gotta give this one to CCat
I'm in agreement with BK and CC (and I'm not ganging up, monkey) - if you're going to post a review about a cigar, please tell us what it is your reviewing. Why go through all the trouble without properly identifying what it was you smoked. I like Torano's - they're a nice cigar - for my tastes, though, I wouldn't say EVERY Torano is a nice cigar...
Just because you smoked a Montecristo #2 and really enjoyed it doesn't do it for me. Was that a Montecristo #2 ISOM, or a Montecristo #2 Dominican? And if it was a Dominican, was it a White label, Platinum, etc.?
It's kinda like saying you really liked that Jaguar sports car you drove the other day and really liked... Which Jaguar was it? Certainly it was a Jaguar, and it was a sports car. Don't just assume I know what you're talking about...
You get my drift...![]()
I'm not crying I'm stating an opinion. to reconcile the voting discrepancy, I state for the record...don't know...don't care...the drama drowned out whatever usefulness was contained in the thread to begin with..........Originally Posted by CoventryCat86
this to me falls once again into the realm of "got the point....move on...."
once again, my opinion.....no doubt an unpopular one with you and george...so please don't point out what an a$$hole I am for saying so....we have been through it all before.
Thanks.![]()
Originally Posted by labmonkey
How the hell did I get dragged into your post? I didn't say anything other than my opinion - just like you did.. How does that make it unpopular with "george and CC"??? There were three others that also voted they had no idea what SFG was talking about.
BTW Scotty - I don't get how you have a victory from this thread. I wouldn't view this vote count as anything other than a neutral response - 5 yes, 5 no, 5 don't care. Where is your landslide?
And I agree with several posts about the use of "gold" and "silver" in the descriptions. I recently had a "silver" exodus, and really enjoyed it. If I were to post a review, I would make that distinction to others so there wouldn't be any confusion about which cigar I was smoking. I wouldn't have thought it was that much better than the gold. There is definitely a difference between the two...
Now, through this thread, the ones participating and viewing it know there is a "Torano Exodus 1959" (the gold band) and the "Torano Exodus 1959 Silver". I knew the two existed, but was not familiar with the formal naming of the cigars by the Torano family. I do now....
Last edited by ggiese; 05-18-2005 at 03:58 PM.
Yes you stated your opinion AND you certainly were "crying"Originally Posted by labmonkey
You whined and this is exactly what you said:
So once you stop whining and crying, I'll stop posting replies like this to your whiningI had no idea and i think this is just another reason for certain members to argue based on past grudges rather than the real issue at hand.![]()
Originally Posted by CoventryCat86
wonk wonk wonk![]()
STOP IT, STOP IT NOW!! I insist!!Originally Posted by labmonkey
![]()
![]()
![]()
No, we MUST have a clear answer in the poll!!! 6/6/6 is not a good number!!!
Ha, this poll is the devil!Originally Posted by ggiese
ooooohhhhh......creeeeeeeeepy!Originally Posted by ggiese
![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks