Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Photo scanning business

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    California, PA
    Posts
    234

    Default Photo scanning business

    I've been thinking of starting kind of a side business of scanning people's old photos and maybe touching them up (adjusting tint, levels, etc. nothing crazy). What do you all think of this? Also, what kind of price range would you be willing to pay for something like this? Maybe, if somebody is willing we could do a free trial run to see how long it would take me to turn it around. Or, I might just keep it on the forum and take cigars in exchange. Any ideas/advice are appreciated. Thanks!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    P.O. Box 14403 Tallahassee, FL 32317
    Posts
    1,906
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    I've been wanting to do something like this for a bunch of pictures from back in the college days. I probably have 200-300 photos I would like to eventually have scanned. What would say 100 photo's run?
    Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere. -- Carl Sagan

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,935

    Default

    Hope you have more time than a side business in mind. One, most places charge a lot of money for this, especially if people don't have the negatives (fingerprints don't look good on scanned photos and thus need to be cleaned). Plus, without an industrial drum scanner, the time it takes to scan something so that it's actually scalable to be blown up and used in a larger frame from 3x4 to 17x30 takes forever. Drum scanners cost A LOT, we're talking bank loan type costs. On a regular high quality home scanner, scanning just a few photos all on the glass at once at 1440 DPI or higher takes FOR-EV-ER!!!!!!!!

    But, if you're just talking about 300 DPI, people don't care if there are fingerprint smudges, etc... Then it really doesn't take much time at all. But you definitely can't charge much for a product like that.

    Not trying to sound discouraging, but I've been the archiver of my family's photos. Takes a heck of a lot of time and it's repetitive and boring, I'd want someone to pay me a lot, but then I'd have to turn out good quality.
    "If you look for truth, you may find comfort in the end; if you look for comfort you will not get either comfort or truth only soft soap and wishful thinking to begin, and in the end, despair." -C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles, California
    Posts
    207

    Default

    Although BigMac's post is meant to deter you from moving forward, you can look at it as a testament to the need of quality photo enhancement.

    BigMac, can't the photo smudge problem be circumvented by providing the disclaimer, "Photos must be cleaned before scanning!"?

    Looking forward to seeing some examples of your work.


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    California, PA
    Posts
    234

    Default

    BigMacFu, I appreciate your advice. I was thinking more of a low end thing. Maybe I'm wrong, but I was thinking that there would be a significant enough amount of people out there with old photos who would be willing to spend something like 20-30 bucks for 100 photos scanned around 400 dpi, which is enough for a quality 8x10.

    I'm interested in hearing from some other people. Hex, maybe we can work out some sort of trial run.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •