Originally Posted by
ggiese
You know - the more I think about it...
Mr. Cigary's lack of ethics has become so flagrant that it merits your complete attention. To organize my discussion, I suggest that we take one step back in the causal chain and improve the lot of humankind. All of Cigary's energy is expended in destroying our moral fiber -- and Cigary knows it. He has a talent for inventing fantasy worlds in which women are crazed Pavlovian sex-dogs who will salivate at any object even remotely phallic in shape. Then again, just because Cigary is a prolific fantasist doesn't mean that everyone and everything discriminates against him -- including the writing on the bathroom stalls. What does this mean for our future? For one thing, it means that his maudlin preoccupation with nihilism, usually sicklied over with such nonsense words as "homeotransplantation", would make sense if a person's honor were determined strictly by his or her ability to etiolate Cigary's enemies. As that's not the case, we can conclude only that his primary viewpoint, that hanging out with vexatious psychics of one sort or another is a wonderful, culturally enriching experience, is directly related to the attitudes in our society that put a clog on all attempts to limit his power. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that when he says that the rigors that his victims have been called upon to undergo have been amply justified in the sphere of concrete achievement, that's just a load of spucatum tauri.
The key to Cigary's soul is his longing for the effortless, irresponsible, automatic consciousness of an animal. He dreads the necessity, the risk, and the responsibility of rational cognition. As a result, we should act as a positive role model for younger people. (Goodness knows, our elected officials aren't going to.) Who among you reading these words is not moved to speak up and speak out against Cigary? It is far too easy for him to use fear, intimidation, sedating substances, and other tools to convince revolting pissants to provide support to backwards banana republics and their execrable dictators. So let him call me mendacious. I call him headlong.
Individually, Cigary's prognoses blow the whole situation way out of proportion. But linked together, Cigary's comments could easily cause (or at least contribute to) a variety of social ills. Even with the increasing number of heinous, conniving toughies, Cigary sometimes has trouble convincing people that he is the ultimate authority on what's right and what's wrong. When he has such trouble, he usually trots out a few irritable moral weaklings to constate authoritatively that all major world powers are controlled by a covert group of "insiders". Whether or not that trick of his works, it's still the case that in these days of political correctness and the changing of how history is taught in schools to fulfill a particular agenda, I oppose Cigary's roorbacks because they are closed-minded. I oppose them because they are brown-nosing. And I oppose them because they will use both overt and covert deceptions to create catchy, new terms for boring, old issues by next weekend. The only way that Mr. Cigary could convince me that society is screaming for his sophistries would be to feed me stupid-flakes for breakfast. Period, finis, and Q.E.D.
Reply With Quote
This thread was dead for 3 weeks until this. 
Just so that we have it preserved for posterity, and possibly to serve as our charter as we take up the mantle of Dipshits everywhere, here is my copy in its entirety:
Bookmarks