Duplicate Accounts

[prophetic_joe]

I'm not "assuming" anything Nate, my statements are based on my PM exchange with Hex. If I were to post it, you'd see for yourself but I'm sorry, I'm not going to do that. And I will assure you once again, my statements are 100% accurate.

Here's the deal, this is HEX'S board and he can do whatever the hell he wants. If he wants to remain silent then that is HIS choice, I for one will NOT browbeat, threaten him or give him infantile ultimatiums like "If you don't do (insert whining, childish, stupid demand here) I will leave and trash you and your board and blah, blah, whine, whine, piss and moan, etc....."

If you and others want to hold something against me when there's no fuggen proof of me ever doing anything wrong, go right ahead and do that. There's nothing I can do to change your mind and once again, I will NOT post my PM exchange with Hex just to satisfy people's curiosity.

We are not privy to the pm's so it is wrong for you to act as if we should know any different then what Hex specifically said. Not seeing the pm's it would be hard to take your statements as 100% accurate. I respect you Bill but I'm not going to take all of your comments as gospel as I'm sure you will not take mine. Hex has however spoken on this matter and it seems to have been dealt with in a good manner.

I never gave an ultimatum nor was I whining about anything.

I never accused you of anything either and I was not and am not holding anything against you.

[CoventryCat86]

We are not privy to the pm's so it is wrong for you to act as if we should know any different then what Hex specifically said. Not seeing the pm's it would be hard to take your statements as 100% accurate. I respect you Bill but I'm not going to take all of your comments as gospel as I'm sure you will not take mine. Hex has however spoken on this matter and it seems to have been dealt with in a good manner.

Okay but now that Hex has elaborated on the whole mess in Post #103, that's consistent with what I've been saying all along so I don't think I'm being "wrong" here as you put it.

I never gave an ultimatum nor was I whining about anything.

That statement doesn't apply to you since you are correct, you never issued ultimatums or whined like others here have. That statement was direct at them, not you, sorry for the confusion.

I never accused you of anything either and I was not and am not holding anything against you.

And I never said you accused me of anything either. However, I did ask you the following two questions twice:

Does this mean you don't "trust" me anymore Nate?
Does this mean you won't participate in a trade or a pass with me?

You replied with:

Both depend

and

I really don't know

so that sure looks to me like you're now holding something against me that you had not prior to this whole "duplicate account" nonsense that proved to be nothing.

[prophetic_joe]

Okay but now that Hex has elaborated on the whole mess in Post #103, that's consistent with what I've been saying all along so I don't think I'm being "wrong" here as you put it.

so that sure looks to me like you're now holding something against me that you had not prior to this whole "duplicate account" nonsense that proved to be nothing.

You being wrong was in acting like we should all know what you knew before Hex's post # 103. You were behaving like us wanting to know what was going on was a terrible thing when you obviously wanted to know as well hence you and Hex pm'ing eachother. To act in this manner was wrong.

I will repeat myself, I am not holding anything against you, saying that makes the whole thing seem personal. When this whole mess started I stopped trusting darn near everybody. I also must admit that in my line of work the person who comes out saying no one is guilty of anything is usually the one guilty of something, so I had to ask myself why you seemed so against Hex making this public. I now understand that it was because you had already talked to Hex via pm and found out information on the situation, with that said you could have saved us both time by either posting in this thread that you knew something from Hex earlier or sending me a pm. I would have thought we knew eachother well enough for you to do that.

[ggiese]

You being wrong was in acting like we should all know what you knew before Hex's post # 103. You were behaving like us wanting to know what was going on was a terrible thing when you obviously wanted to know as well hence you and Hex pm'ing eachother. To act in this manner was wrong.

I will repeat myself, I am not holding anything against you, saying that makes the whole thing seem personal. When this whole mess started I stopped trusting darn near everybody. I also must admit that in my line of work the person who comes out saying no one is guilty of anything is usually the one guilty of something, so I had to ask myself why you seemed so against Hex making this public. I now understand that it was because you had already talked to Hex via pm and found out information on the situation, with that said you could have saved us both time by either posting in this thread that you knew something from Hex earlier or sending me a pm. I would have thought we knew eachother well enough for you to do that.

I hear what you're saying... Kinda hard to trust anyone unless you REALLY know them, eh? I mean - really - we hear about all the "friendships" on these cigar boards. The only ones I really put any kind of faith in are those that have been over years of interactions. Some of the people I've seen that have been around for six months or a year and are "good friends" with others on the site raise my suspicions...

The one thing you can do is trust that those that have been around for a long time typically have weathered a lot of the crap you're seeing now. And have a pretty uncanny insight into what's really going on. It may surprise you sometimes when they go after someone you think is a great guy - only to find out later they weren't so wrong about going after the person. I've seen it a number of times - and I've rarely seen it be wrong...

[CoventryCat86]

You being wrong was in acting like we should all know what you knew before Hex's post # 103. You were behaving like us wanting to know what was going on was a terrible thing when you obviously wanted to know as well hence you and Hex pm'ing eachother. To act in this manner was wrong.

I will repeat myself, I am not holding anything against you, saying that makes the whole thing seem personal. When this whole mess started I stopped trusting darn near everybody. I also must admit that in my line of work the person who comes out saying no one is guilty of anything is usually the one guilty of something, so I had to ask myself why you seemed so against Hex making this public. I now understand that it was because you had already talked to Hex via pm and found out information on the situation, with that said you could have saved us both time by either posting in this thread that you knew something from Hex earlier or sending me a pm. I would have thought we knew eachother well enough for you to do that.

so I had to ask myself why you seemed so against Hex making this public.

I wasn't "so against Hex making this public" I merely pointed out to you and the rest of the mob assembled that Hex has a policy that he stated in the first post in this thread which is:

Duplicate Accounts are not permitted. Anyone caught signing up duplicate accounts is subject to immediate banning (yes your main account will be banned too).

If you think you might fall under this new policy, then PM me and we can handle the matter with out the drama.

Thanks.

Since this is HEX'S policy, I felt that you and the rest of the mob who were demanding that people be "outed" were wrong and I still feel that way, not because I was "guilty" as you said.

with that said you could have saved us both time by either posting in this thread that you knew something from Hex earlier or sending me a pm.

Yeah, like you would have believed me if I did that.....
You weren't going to believe a damn thing I said until you heard it directly from Hex so sorry Nate, I don't think your suggestion here would have been a solution as you're now implying that it would have been.

[prophetic_joe]

I wasn't "so against Hex making this public" I merely pointed out to you and the rest of the mob assembled that Hex has a policy that he stated in the first post in this thread which is:

Since this is HEX'S policy, I felt that you and the rest of the mob who were demanding that people be "outed" were wrong and I still feel that way, not because I was "guilty" as you said.



Yeah, like you would have believed me if I did that.....
You weren't going to believe a damn thing I said until you heard it directly from Hex so sorry Nate, I don't think your suggestion here would have been a solution as you're now implying that it would have been.

You like to leave out important words when you decide how to respond to me it seems Bill. I said it "seemed you were so against Hex making this public", not that you were, since I don't pretend that I can read another man's mind all I can do is respond to what I percieve his ideas to be based on tone. Based on the tone of your posts you seemed against Hex making this public.

I'm now off to vacation o I won't be able to respond for a while but ask yourself this Bill, in the over 2 years I have been here have you ever seen me to be so closeminded as you now appear to believe? It seems you may be the one ho is holding something against me and I for one find that to be quite a shame.

Again you leave out something that is important. I did not say you were guilty I said in the history of my line of work your actions and protestations in this thread would have been something the guilty party would have done. Again I can not read another man's mind so I can't say exactly why you ar anyone else does what they do I can only base my perceptions off of my experience and in my experience that is the case 99% of the time.

If I can't read another man's I can only assume that you cannot either so I can say without a doubt that you are completely wrong here. You can however believe what you want.

[kevin7]

When you fuckers use colors and such in your posts it makes them seem like a child whining ,just say what the fuck you have to say and shut the fuck up.


Some of you fuckers could suck the fun out of a titty bar

[nhcigarfan]

When the posts go to color I stop reading them.

[CoventryCat86]

You like to leave out important words when you decide how to respond to me it seems Bill. I said it "seemed you were so against Hex making this public", not that you were, since I don't pretend that I can read another man's mind all I can do is respond to what I percieve his ideas to be based on tone. Based on the tone of your posts you seemed against Hex making this public.

I'm now off to vacation o I won't be able to respond for a while but ask yourself this Bill, in the over 2 years I have been here have you ever seen me to be so closeminded as you now appear to believe? It seems you may be the one ho is holding something against me and I for one find that to be quite a shame.

Again you leave out something that is important. I did not say you were guilty I said in the history of my line of work your actions and protestations in this thread would have been something the guilty party would have done. Again I can not read another man's mind so I can't say exactly why you ar anyone else does what they do I can only base my perceptions off of my experience and in my experience that is the case 99% of the time.

If I can't read another man's I can only assume that you cannot either so I can say without a doubt that you are completely wrong here. You can however believe what you want.

I'm sorry Nate. You are correct, it is wrong of me to draw conclusions on what you're thinking. I've been very critical of people when the do the same to me so once again, you're correct and I'm wrong.

[ggiese]

Why are you bothering to explain anything, Bill - nobody cares...

Would ya quit gnawing on da bone???