War after war, whether is new one? HISTORY REPEATS

[Oleg281]

Attack to London in a threshold of the summit of the G8,
has broken a new wave of democratic colonization,
has strengthened anticolonial resistance
and became significant event in struggle
with the international nazism and profascism.

The reason of terrorism in London.
Democracy in England is constructed on the basis of totalitarian
control over the person. Therefore the society supports
state policy and is out of internal political problems. Such society is used
by the government for promotion of colonization and development of Mother country.
It is not possible to defend antifascist and anticolonial opinions
in such system.

[Oleg281]

Terrorists who attacked London and terrorists which work under covering of London in their countries - are people with different points of view.
Terrorists who are supported by London are armed democrats in their native land, they are helpers to
London in it's democratic colonization, a treacherous column. London supports dissidents specially
to destroy other states and colonize them.
These invited democrats regret about happened attacks to London directed
against democratic colonization of developing countries and the countries of the third world.

[Iced T]

[Oleg281]

Rigid administrative selection of persons who define a policy of the state, and ideas discussed in a society. For realization of these problems the society and its citizens are controled.
In a totalitarian society there can not be equal rights for citizens, that we can see on an example of structure of authority in England.

Ideology of terrorism is the anticolonialism.
Against what ideology English government struggles?
And what ideology advances?
May be colonialism? Iraq?

[samclemmons]

This guy spams a million boards with this nonsense. Google oleg281 and you can see 'em all.

[Iced T]

Oleg, what is your personal stake in getting us to agree with you? Or are you just trying to "inform us?"

[Oleg281]

I think, that the terrorism in England is connected with occupation of Iraq,
and London does not wish to disengage armies because it is possible to get
a loss of profit for the English companies in Iraq.
Whether war will have been thrown to the territory of England?

[labmonkey]

This guy spams a million boards with this nonsense. Google oleg281 and you can see 'em all.

sounds like a good enough reason for a banning to me...

[samclemmons]

sounds like a good enough reason for a banning to me...

Yeah, I thought so too. Then I pm'd Hecks abut this pos and he ignored it. No reply, no action. Good enough reason for me not to hang around here.

NA