Results 1 to 20 of 163

Thread: Where on the political spectrum do you lie? (Mods: Please don't move!)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Amanda Guest

    Default

    Sean Penn is now the spokesperson for the Democratic Party? Guess I missed the memo.

    I always get a kick out of the venom that conservatives spew about Hollywood....considering how starstruck Republicans become upon discovering a celebrity that embraces their view. A celebrity aligns him or herself with the party that bashes Hollywood as part of its platform and the Republicans are falling over each other to convince the said celebrity to run for higher office. Aside from President Ronald Reagan, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and NRA President Charlton Heston, the GOP has actively sought out Bo Derek, Dennis Miller and Kelsey Grammer to run for office in California. And notice the B-list celebrity lineup they trotted out at last year's convention (Rick Schroeder, Elizabeth from Survivor, and my personal favorite, Ron Silver).

    And how about Britney Spears and Kid Rock? They're both Republicans! But they're also both in the bullseye of Republican culture warriors...or at least they were before they publicly supported George Bush. What's a conservative to do? Do they invite Kid Rock and Britney Spears to respectively run for the Mayor of Detroit and the Governor of Louisiana? Or do they quietly shift the focus off of Britney and on to a Democratic celebrity who wears too few clothes? Or do they distract the faithful simply by mentioning the name of Sean Penn and Michael Moore, instigating an instant culture war feeding frenzy and providing instant amnesia about the party's conflicting relationship with Hollywood.

  2. #2
    reaganyouth84 Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Amanda
    Sean Penn is now the spokesperson for the Democratic Party? Guess I missed the memo.

    I always get a kick out of the venom that conservatives spew about Hollywood....considering how starstruck Republicans become upon discovering a celebrity that embraces their view. A celebrity aligns him or herself with the party that bashes Hollywood as part of its platform and the Republicans are falling over each other to convince the said celebrity to run for higher office. Aside from President Ronald Reagan, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and NRA President Charlton Heston, the GOP has actively sought out Bo Derek, Dennis Miller and Kelsey Grammer to run for office in California. And notice the B-list celebrity lineup they trotted out at last year's convention (Rick Schroeder, Elizabeth from Survivor, and my personal favorite, Ron Silver).

    And how about Britney Spears and Kid Rock? They're both Republicans! But they're also both in the bullseye of Republican culture warriors...or at least they were before they publicly supported George Bush. What's a conservative to do? Do they invite Kid Rock and Britney Spears to respectively run for the Mayor of Detroit and the Governor of Louisiana? Or do they quietly shift the focus off of Britney and on to a Democratic celebrity who wears too few clothes? Or do they distract the faithful simply by mentioning the name of Sean Penn and Michael Moore, instigating an instant culture war feeding frenzy and providing instant amnesia about the party's conflicting relationship with Hollywood.
    Yeah, you missed the memo, it said: CAN'T YOU TAKE A F*CKING JOKE?!

    Jesus Christ Amanda, this shit is just funny, lighten up. God, your head is going to explode! You are so dry it makes me want to kill myself. You know, you are like the H-bomb, everyones out having a good time, then you show up and everyone dies. Of course now that I've said that you'll say something like, "How can you make fun of the destruction the H-bomb causes, we should drop hugs instead." Or, "think of how many people we could feed with the money it costs to make 1 H-bomb." Man, it's just a joke, lighten up. You are the most up tight liberal I've ever come into contact with.
    -Mike
    Last edited by reaganyouth84; 07-21-2005 at 03:06 AM.

  3. #3
    Iced T Guest

    Default

    Sorry Amanda but... you do.
    Last edited by Iced T; 07-21-2005 at 03:01 AM.

  4. #4
    Amanda Guest

    Default

    reaganyouth, my post was intended for humor as well, which I would have thought would have been obvious. Iced-T, please point out one of the "lies" I've told.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Granger, Indiana
    Posts
    1,393

    Default

    A couple of popular tax misconceptions by both sides.

    To the liberals:
    Rich people do not pay less taxes. They generally have much more complex financial affairs and spend more money in more directions. If something they spend money on is tax deductible, it's worth their time to take advantage of it.

    To the conservatives:
    Going to a tax system where only sales tax is used and abolishing income tax would compltely screw the working class and poor. The less money you make, the higher a percentage of your income that you spend on goods and services. Therefore the higher a tax percentage you will pay.


    To everyone:
    The current system is pretty fair percentage-wise. After it's all said and done and the returns are given back, we (middle class) spend about %20 of our income on taxes. The rich pay few percent more, and the poor pay practically nothing.

  6. #6
    Amanda Guest

    Default

    Kenyth, I completely agree with you about a nationwide sales tax. Aside from its regressivity, it encourages thrift in an economy driven by consumption. If I have to pay 23% higher tax rates every time I go to purchase a car or a piece of furniture, I'm gonna buy fewer cars and less furniture. Furthermore, I can't envision a scenario where a sales tax on the selected items subjected to the tax would produce enough revenue to finance government. In fact, a black market would likely develop for goods whose prices would be artificially inflated by the national sales tax. There are so many things wrong with the supersized national sales tax idea that I could go on all day listing them.

    As for the current tax structure being fair, times are changing quickly. Bear in mind that from the 1950s through the 1970's, the top tax rate was never lower than 70%. Today, it's 33%....and that's on top of recent revisions to further reduce the tax burden on stock holders, heirs and heiresses. Who gets to the pay the taxes that they're not? In the short term, smokers, homeowners and college students, all of whom are seeing "sin taxes," property taxes and college tuition rates soar far faster than the rate of inflation. In the long-term, the burden will fall on future generations who will see higher income tax rates necessary to finance national debt interest.

    And keep in mind that this regressive restructuring of the tax code is occurring at a time when those seeing their taxes cut are also seeing their share of the national GDP soar, a dynamic that's been in place for about 30 years now. On the other hand, those seeing their taxes increase have largely been experiencing flatlined income growth over the same period. It's a system doomed to destroy itself.

  7. #7
    reaganyouth84 Guest

    Default

    [QUOTE=Amanda]Kenyth, I completely agree with you about a nationwide sales tax. Aside from its regressivity, it encourages thrift in an economy driven by consumption. If I have to pay 23% higher tax rates every time I go to purchase a car or a piece of furniture, I'm gonna buy fewer cars and less furniture.QUOTE]

    Do you have any idea what that would do to our market, and economy if we cut back on what we purchase? Not only on a national level, but on a world wide level? Let's put it this way, it wouldn't be good.
    -Mike

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Amanda
    Sean Penn is now the spokesperson for the Democratic Party? Guess I missed the memo.

    I always get a kick out of the venom that conservatives spew about Hollywood....considering how starstruck Republicans become upon discovering a celebrity that embraces their view. A celebrity aligns him or herself with the party that bashes Hollywood as part of its platform and the Republicans are falling over each other to convince the said celebrity to run for higher office. Aside from President Ronald Reagan, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and NRA President Charlton Heston, the GOP has actively sought out Bo Derek, Dennis Miller and Kelsey Grammer to run for office in California. And notice the B-list celebrity lineup they trotted out at last year's convention (Rick Schroeder, Elizabeth from Survivor, and my personal favorite, Ron Silver).

    And how about Britney Spears and Kid Rock? They're both Republicans! But they're also both in the bullseye of Republican culture warriors...or at least they were before they publicly supported George Bush. What's a conservative to do? Do they invite Kid Rock and Britney Spears to respectively run for the Mayor of Detroit and the Governor of Louisiana? Or do they quietly shift the focus off of Britney and on to a Democratic celebrity who wears too few clothes? Or do they distract the faithful simply by mentioning the name of Sean Penn and Michael Moore, instigating an instant culture war feeding frenzy and providing instant amnesia about the party's conflicting relationship with Hollywood.

    Amanda i think its because of the raw, unreasonable hatred that many of the celebrities on the left display. Granted, there are some celebrities on the right that parrot their behavior, but almost all of the raw hatred I hear about is from the loony left. Plus, the vast majority of Hollywood types are leftish, liberal or downright socialist, so the squeaky wheel gets the grease as the saying goes.
    There's only two kinds of cigars, the kind you like and the kind you don't.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •