Kinky for Govenor

[CoventryCat86]

"Secondly, this is a CIGAR board and if you like debating politics there are more suitable boards to do that than here. "


That's a joke right? The top of my screen reads "Cigarsmokers.com Politics Board". Beyond that, this all started by me responding to a post you made REGARDING politics. Surely you jest.

Not a joke at all, just a simple suggestion that if you are more interested in debating politics than talking about cigars or getting involved in trades, passes, box splits or meeting other cigar smokers, etc., there are debate boards that concentrate on that. And when you make baiting and trolling posts on any type of internet BB, you're probably going to get called on it, one way or another

I see you skipped right by the other two points I made in my post that you quoted a part of Any particular reason? Just to refresh your memory:

First off, he NEVER said "bubbleheaded sorority bimbo" so don't pull a Scotty
Secondly, this is a CIGAR board and if you like debating politics there are more suitable boards to do that than here.
Finally, with regard to what he REALLY said, if the shoe fits........

I take it you're not in a sorority, correct? Why do you make disparaging comments about sorority girls? TheyCallMeManix got in a whole lot of trouble here for making disparaging comments about a certain race of people and this inappropriate, degrading comment about sorority girls is really kinda mean, don't you think? Or do you think before you post?

[Amanda]

Never thought I'd get lectured about the inappropriateness of debating politics on a given board by the very person who raised the topic in the first place. Then again, I don't even try to understand Republican logic anymore, and apparently I'm not alone considering you guys' approval ratings are sinking faster than the Titanic.

You're right about one thing. I should have left out the quotes regarding the bubbleheaded sorority bimbo since cigar no baka did not use those words. I apologize for putting those words in his mouth, even though they were clearly implied by the verbiage he did use.

As for the accuracy of his statement, I won't deny that age brings wisdom. Perhaps he's right that as soon I cross some arbitrary age threshold, I'll undergo the transition towards the cerebral sophistication of members of the embattled majority party swirling down the drains of public opinion polls. Curiously though, the states that vote in accordance with the "mature adults" have the lowest average IQ's in the nation. http://chrisevans3d.com/files/iq.htm It's getting awfully confusing for this slow-witted young'un.

[CoventryCat86]

Never thought I'd get lectured about the inappropriateness of debating politics on a given board by the very person who raised the topic in the first place. Then again, I don't even try to understand Republican logic anymore, and apparently I'm not alone considering you guys' approval ratings are sinking faster than the Titanic.

You're right about one thing. I should have left out the quotes regarding the bubbleheaded sorority bimbo since cigar no baka did not use those words. I apologize for putting those words in his mouth, even though they were clearly implied by the verbiage he did use.

As for the accuracy of his statement, I won't deny that age brings wisdom. Perhaps he's right that as soon I cross some arbitrary age threshold, I'll undergo the transition towards the cerebral sophistication of members of the embattled majority party swirling down the drains of public opinion polls. Curiously though, the states that vote in accordance with the "mature adults" have the lowest average IQ's in the nation. http://chrisevans3d.com/files/iq.htm It's getting awfully confusing for this slow-witted young'un.

I didn't "raise the topic in the first place" so please stop pulling a "Scotty." Did I start this thread? There's also no need to take a slap at all "Republicans" just because you've got your panties in a wad here, what is that all about?

Since you've gone down that road, how many cigars would you like to bet that the Republicans will STILL control Congress AND the US Senate after the 2006 election?

You rightfully apologize to CNB yet you go right back to your BS of claiming it was "clearly implied" LMAO, you're pathetic.

And you continue with your holier than thou condscending crap in your last paragraph!!! Again, if you're as confident in the BS that you spew, then how 'bout putting your money or cigars where your mouth is? My ex-wife is rolling on the floor laughing at your self-righteous, know-it-all, vague, weak-willed and easily led Pisces traits. She studies this astrology stuff and in your case, it's right on

You're babbling now Amanda. As I suggested in a previous post, you'd be wise to quit while you're behind.........

[nhcigarfan]

What, you two won't even acknowledge my witty Ron Jeremy post.

[CoventryCat86]

What, you two won't even acknowledge my witty Ron Jeremy post.

Uh.....who's Ron Jeremy?

[nhcigarfan]

http://www.ronjeremy.com/

[Amanda]

"I didn't "raise the topic in the first place"'

The topic at issue here was Gore winning his home state. It was my response to your statement on that topic that triggered your initial name-calling tantrum. My advice would be that if you don't believe debating politics is appropriate on the "Politics" board of a cigar website, perhaps you shouldn't debate politics on the "Politics" board of a cigar website. What a concept!!!

"There's also no need to take a slap at all "Republicans" just because you've got your panties in a wad here, what is that all about?"

Now that I really take offense to. I'm not even wearing panties.

On the issue of the 2006 elections, I'm not gonna take your bet. I agree that the Republicans will still hold the majority after the midterms given the geography of the open Senate seats and the entrenched incumbency advantage of the House seats....not to mention the uninspired leadership of the Democratic Party which I don't believe will be able to generate enough national momentum to send Tom DeLay back to Sugar Land.

As for your wife, I can only hope that when I make the transition to "adult maturity", my newfound admiration for the ruinous policies of the Republican Party will be accompanied with the gift of prophecy by way of crystal balls, Tarot cards and constellation alignments in outer space. Yeah, I'm REALLY looking forward to shedding this college bimbo skin and persevering in the adult world of Republican astrologists.

[nhcigarfan]

"

Now that I really take offense to. I'm not even wearing panties.

Sweet, on that note, Goodnight. I'll enjoy reading how this all plays out tomorrow.

[CoventryCat86]

"I didn't "raise the topic in the first place"'

The topic at issue here was Gore winning his home state. It was my response to your statement on that topic that triggered your initial name-calling tantrum. My advice would be that if you don't believe debating politics is appropriate on the "Politics" board of a cigar website, perhaps you shouldn't debate politics on the "Politics" board of a cigar website. What a concept!!!

"There's also no need to take a slap at all "Republicans" just because you've got your panties in a wad here, what is that all about?"

Now that I really take offense to. I'm not even wearing panties.

On the issue of the 2006 elections, I'm not gonna take your bet. I agree that the Republicans will still hold the majority after the midterms given the geography of the open Senate seats and the entrenched incumbency advantage of the House seats....not to mention the uninspired leadership of the Democratic Party which I don't believe will be able to generate enough national momentum to send Tom DeLay back to Sugar Land.

As for your wife, I can only hope that when I make the transition to "adult maturity", my newfound admiration for the ruinous policies of the Republican Party will be accompanied with the gift of prophecy by way of crystal balls, Tarot cards and constellation alignments in outer space. Yeah, I'm REALLY looking forward to shedding this college bimbo skin and persevering in the adult world of Republican astrologists.

"Name calling tantrum" there you go again with the gross exaggerations Of course you didn't engage in that did you (I seem to remember something about sorority girls but my memory isn't as good as it used to be......) and please don't continue to try and back peddle your way out of the fact that you made a baiting/trolling post or try and change the point of my argument with you. For the THIRD time, I suggested to you that if you are MORE INTERESTED in debating politics and trying to look so smart with your political views then maybe a political debate board would be more your speed rather than a cigar board. It's really a pretty simple statement that you insist on trying to twist into something else.

Ah, nice deflection of your stupid slap to all Republicans in general (not wearing any panties), cute but you're pulling a Scotty again which is to deflect and not answer the question.

Gee, you seemed pretty darn sure of yourself when you stated this:

Then again, I don't even try to understand Republican logic anymore, and apparently I'm not alone considering you guys' approval ratings are sinking faster than the Titanic.

and you change your tune and won't put your "money" where your mouth is! You sure can talk the talk but when it comes to walking the walk, you fold like a house of cards.

As far as the astrology stuff, once again, you're pulling a Scotty, trying to prove to us how clever and "educated" you are with more of your condescending BS. I simply pointed out the characteristics associated with your particular sign of the Zodiac sure seem to fit you perfectly and you pull a Scotty and make yet another smart assed political comment which makes no sense and you should know better (heck, maybe you don't.....).

Again quitting while you're behind is just something you can't bring yourself to do can you?

Are you some kind of distant cousin of Scotty 'cause you're sure acting just like him

[Shagaroo]

Now that I really take offense to. I'm not even wearing panties.

If you weren't pathetic before, you sure as hell just cannonballed your skank ass into the deep end of pathetic now. Talk about kindergarten antics. Sorry, I don't think you are going to find many horny 16 year olds to run to your aid on this forum.

[Neuromancer]

"I didn't "raise the topic in the first place"'

...Now that I really take offense to. I'm not even wearing panties...

Can we just focus on the important issue here? I wanna know why she's not wearing panties and what that implies...

[cigar no baka]

Never thought I'd get lectured about the inappropriateness of debating politics on a given board by the very person who raised the topic in the first place. Then again, I don't even try to understand Republican logic anymore, and apparently I'm not alone considering you guys' approval ratings are sinking faster than the Titanic.

You're right about one thing. I should have left out the quotes regarding the bubbleheaded sorority bimbo since cigar no baka did not use those words. I apologize for putting those words in his mouth, even though they were clearly implied by the verbiage he did use.

As for the accuracy of his statement, I won't deny that age brings wisdom. Perhaps he's right that as soon I cross some arbitrary age threshold, I'll undergo the transition towards the cerebral sophistication of members of the embattled majority party swirling down the drains of public opinion polls. Curiously though, the states that vote in accordance with the "mature adults" have the lowest average IQ's in the nation. http://chrisevans3d.com/files/iq.htm It's getting awfully confusing for this slow-witted young'un.

Clearly implies? Maybe so in your mind, but that says more about you than it does me.