9/11 Conspiracy

[SmokinDVM]

Even I don't think this was a Gov. conspiracy. It illustrated how useless the present admin was/continues to be. They let it happen by ignoring warnings from the experts, which is still SOP for this group, but there is no way the Gov. could set up something like this without SOMEONE coming forward with something more than, "but look at the video". The size of this kind of operation would be huge, and too easily detectable. Heck, even the terrorists were discovered prior to 9/11, the evidence was just ignored.

[CoventryCat86]

Even I don't think this was a Gov. conspiracy. It illustrated how useless the present admin was/continues to be. They let it happen by ignoring warnings from the experts, which is still SOP for this group, but there is no way the Gov. could set up something like this without SOMEONE coming forward with something more than, "but look at the video". The size of this kind of operation would be huge, and too easily detectable. Heck, even the terrorists were discovered prior to 9/11, the evidence was just ignored.

Hmmm, so the Clinton administration didn't ignore warnings and evidence and just did a grand ole job with the whole terrorist threat, didn't they? Embassy bombings, USS Cole, WTC bombing in the mid 1990s, and that's just for starters. Now in defense of the inaction by the Clinton administration, the American public didn't have the stomach for it so I really don't lay the all of the blame at Clinton's feet. September 11, 2001 certainlly changed your average American's attitude on the terrorist threat but due to the ACTION of the Bush administration since then, there haven't been any further terrorist attacks on our soil correct, or did I forget something?

That's okay, the American public trusts Republicans more than Democrats to handle the terrorist threat so spin it all ya want Barry, but your nonsense is pretty much falling on deaf ears.

[Loudpipes78]

Watch last weeks South Park... it was their topic for the episode.

[SmokinDVM]

Hmmm, so the Clinton administration didn't ignore warnings and evidence and just did a grand ole job with the whole terrorist threat, didn't they? Embassy bombings, USS Cole, WTC bombing in the mid 1990s, and that's just for starters. Now in defense of the inaction by the Clinton administration, the American public didn't have the stomach for it so I really don't lay the all of the blame at Clinton's feet. September 11, 2001 certainlly changed your average American's attitude on the terrorist threat but due to the ACTION of the Bush administration since then, there haven't been any further terrorist attacks on our soil correct, or did I forget something?

That's okay, the American public trusts Republicans more than Democrats to handle the terrorist threat so spin it all ya want Barry, but your nonsense is pretty much falling on deaf ears.

Total dead and injured due to terrorists during Clintons Presidency?

How many responsible criminals were jailed or killed during the Clinton Presidency?

How many DEAD AND WOUNDED U.S. SOLDIERS, and those we are supposed to be helping, during Dumbya's watch?

And, latest polls show Americans now trust that the Democrats will do a better job fighting terrorists, than the other party. Interesting.

'Nuff said.

[CoventryCat86]

Total dead and injured due to terrorists during Clintons Presidency?

How many responsible criminals were jailed or killed during the Clinton Presidency?

How many DEAD AND WOUNDED U.S. SOLDIERS, and those we are supposed to be helping, during Dumbya's watch?

And, latest polls show Americans now trust that the Democrats will do a better job fighting terrorists, than the other party. Interesting.

'Nuff said.

Your "questions" don't really mean anything. What's more important is that there haven't been any additional terrorists attacks in this country since we decided to get serious with them which as I mentioned earlier even if Clinton wanted to, a majority of the American people didn't have the stomach for at the time.

The "latest poll" results do surprise me. I wonder what would make people change their minds from just as recently as two weeks ago? It doesn't any sense to me because nothing has happened in the last couple of weeks on the terrorism front to explain this complete reversal.

And once again, is there REALLY any need for the "Dumbya" name calling Barry?

[SmokinDVM]

Spin, spin, spin, spin...

The "latest poll" results do surprise me. I wonder what would make people change their minds from just as recently as two weeks ago? It doesn't any sense to me because nothing has happened in the last couple of weeks on the terrorism front to explain this complete reversal.

And once again, is there REALLY any need for the "Dumbya" name calling Barry?

http://mediamatters.org/items/200608080005
And more recently...

Democrats now outdistance Republicans on every single issue that could decide voters’ choices come Nov. 7. In addition to winning—for the first time in the NEWSWEEK poll—on the question of which party is more trusted to fight the war on terror (44 to 37 percent) and moral values (42 percent to 36 percent), the Democrats now inspire more trust than the GOP on handling Iraq (47 to 34); the economy (53 to 31); health care (57 to 24); federal spending and the deficit (53 to 29); gas and oil prices (56 to 23); and immigration (43 to 34).

LINK


As far as dumbya goes, if it continues to get a rise out of you, I'll keep using it.

BTW,
This is my last post to this thread, I wouldn't want to piss off any more of the "natives".

[bigpoppapuff]

i'll keep calling him "dumbya","shrub",and sometimes,i've referred to him as "useless piece of shit"....


makes me feel good...

[bigpoppapuff]

"failed leader" has a nice ring to it,as well...

[ggiese]

i'll keep calling him "dumbya","shrub",and sometimes,i've referred to him as "useless piece of shit"....


makes me feel good...

Not necessarily a bad thing...

Calling ALL republicans "shitstains", "pedophiles", etc. is a bit over the top...

[CoventryCat86]

As far as dumbya goes, if it continues to get a rise out of you, I'll keep using it.

First off, it doesn't get a "rise" out of me, it makes you look immature with your constant namecalling as has been pointed out to you before. It also significantly reduces the credibility of any argument that you're trying to make which most times are pretty weak in the first place.

BTW,
This is my last post to this thread

Okay, who here is NOT surprised that this statement wound up being pure bullshit?

[CoventryCat86]

http://mediamatters.org/items/200608080005
And more recently...
LINK


As far as dumbya goes, if it continues to get a rise out of you, I'll keep using it.

BTW,
This is my last post to this thread, I wouldn't want to piss off any more of the "natives".

How many times have you gone back on your word now?