Torano Exodus 1959 torpedo

[CoventryCat86]

Switching the topic yet again. You know darn well that my titling of the review was correct. If a person didn't know the difference, all they had to do was ask. It's the same when one doesn't know what BOTL or ISOM means. You ask and then you pick up the lingo. At least, that's what I learned. Once again, I'm using the Torano site to reference the cigars. That is the proper usage as a descriptor for the cigar in question. Re-read Hex's posts about it, it's clear for all to see.

I'm not switching the topic you asshole, YOU are. You said I'm not answering your "questions" and asked you to please post exactly WHAT questions you've asked that you claim I have not answered and the fact that you posted a lie about your brother in law and when I ask you to elaborate, you completely ignore me.

[SFG75]

I'm not switching the topic you asshole, YOU are. You said I'm not answering your "questions" and asked you to please post exactly WHAT questions you've asked that you claim I have not answered and the fact that you posted a lie about your brother in law and when I ask you to elaborate, you completely ignore me.

Here they are Bill, from a few pages ago when you referred to me as "delusional."

here are the questions:

1.)Hex "got it." He offered to do a box-split with anyone and posted this link : http://www.caminoviejo.com/store/ca...exodus-1959.htm Take a wild guess as to which cigar he knew I was referring to. Go ahead, take a guess......

i did assume it was the gold one because thats all i knew existed.

2.)Does Drake say that it is the gold or silver that he assumed I was talking about?

If the gold is the only one he assumed that existed, how does prove that he thought it was another cigar?

3.)Does Jaewing in his posts ever indicate that he thought I was talking about the silver?

[CoventryCat86]

here are the questions:

1.)Hex "got it." He offered to do a box-split with anyone and posted this link : http://www.caminoviejo.com/store/ca...exodus-1959.htm Take a wild guess as to which cigar he knew I was referring to. Go ahead, take a guess......


Quote:
i did assume it was the gold one because thats all i knew existed.


2.)Does Drake say that it is the gold or silver that he assumed I was talking about?

If the gold is the only one he assumed that existed, how does prove that he thought it was another cigar?

3.)Does Jaewing in his posts ever indicate that he thought I was talking about the silver?

Again, are you going to give me an answer to my question?

You first.......

Actually no, I tell ya what, I'll address your "questions"
1. Hex knew because he owns a small cigar retail operation that offers only a few lines of cigars where Carlos Torano is one of them. It's kind of like asking me a question about Jaguars where I will know more than 99.99% of the general population so of course he knew.
2. Drake knew AFTER reading the thread where Hex made the distinction that you did not so this is a moot point.
3. jaewing also knew AFTER reading the thread where Hex made the distinction so this is also a moot point.

Once again, puff's poll and other posts here show that others were also not clear on which cigar you were talking about until I pointed this out.

[SFG75]

Again, are you going to give me an answer to my question?

You first.......

No, that is off topic, unlike my questions.

here are the questions:

1.)Hex "got it." He offered to do a box-split with anyone and posted this link : http://www.caminoviejo.com/store/ca...exodus-1959.htm Take a wild guess as to which cigar he knew I was referring to. Go ahead, take a guess......


Quote:
i did assume it was the gold one because thats all i knew existed.


2.)Does Drake say that it is the gold or silver that he assumed I was talking about?

If the gold is the only one he assumed that existed, how does prove that he thought it was another cigar?

3.)Does Jaewing in his posts ever indicate that he thought I was talking about the silver?

Bill, you have picked a fight with me about the Torano title of my review. Have you done so due to your efforts to educate newbies? No, everyone here knows that you and I have a history and that this is nothing more than an opportunity(albeit a very small and inconsequential opportunity among others) to try and prove a point. Rather than let folks who have questions or concerns PM me or post it publicly, you have annointed yourself to speak for others. This matter is closed Bill. The simple fact is this. My titling of the review was correct-even the poll reflects that. If anyone was confused, they could've asked. I'm done with this thread. Good evening to you.

[CoventryCat86]

No, that is off topic, unlike my questions.

here are the questions:



Bill, you have picked a fight with me about the Torano title of my review. Have you done so due to your efforts to educate newbies? No, everyone here knows that you and I have a history and that this is nothing more than an opportunity(albeit a very small and inconsequential opportunity among others) to try and prove a point. Rather than let folks who have questions or concerns PM me or post it publicly, you have annointed yourself to speak for others. This matter is closed Bill. The simple fact is this. My titling of the review was correct-even the poll reflects that. If anyone was confused, they could've asked. I'm done with this thread. Good evening to you.

And once again, you refuse to address my question about your claim about Randy and you have said for the SECOND time you are done with this thread.

Where in the hell do you get this bullshit?

you have annointed yourself to speak for others.

If anyone was confused, they could've asked.

I was confused I did ask and explained many times that while you and hex "KNOW" it all with regard to the Carlos Torano line, many others do not. Pretty simple, and you couldn't help yourself with your pathetic superiority attitude and turned this whole thread into a complete mess.

My titling of the review was correct-even the poll reflects that.

Okay, tell ya what, I'll agree with you that you were RIGHT but the Poll DOES NOT reflect that. What the poll reflects is my point that half the people DID NOT know WTF cigar you were talking about. Off the top of your head, is a 1991 Jaguar XJ6 a:
1. Series III
2. XJ40
3. X308
4. X350
5. XBox
6. Land Rover
What if I told you it was a 1993 XJ6 "Vanden Plas". would that change your answer?
(This is a trick question with more than one correct answer, see if you can indeed figure it out and explain exactly WHY, LMAO )

Again, you really should answer to the lie you posted about Randy who I maintain is one of the LAST people to want a confrontation particularly with a family member over a stupid cigar while you claim that he's the first to stand up and say something. Face it Scotty, you lied and I caught you........and you continue to refuse to respond which only proves my point that you are a liar and cannot be trusted.

This matter is closed Bill.

LMFAO, oh just because YOU say it is? Too bad Scotty boy, you are not a moderator here and you don't get to decide that. Do you really think you DO get to decide that? Well I'll let you in on a little secret, this isn't your Junior High Social Studies Class where you get to boss people around or a cigar site that you "own" where you get to make all the rules.

Can everyone see why this asshole was a complete failure as a moderator on the Island of the Misfit Toys? The sad thing is if Zac had not made a POS like Scotty a moderator, the site would not have imploded in on itself because this is how Scotty deals with situations, you're all seeing it first hand, he's an offensive arrogant prick who is much more of a liability than as asset to any on-lin BB he chooses to involve himself with.

Again Scotty, I can't convey my gratification enough as you only strengthen and reinforce my arguments against you. For that I thank you

[SFG75]

O.K., I'm back for a third time.

I was confused I did ask and explained many times that while you and hex "KNOW" it all with regard to the Carlos Torano line, many others do not.

Pure bunk, you didn't ask. Here is what you posted:

(From CC's first post)

Oh Mr. "F-L-A-W-L-E-S-S" your review might actually be useful if you had told us if the one you wrote the review on was a "Gold" or "Silver"

There was no question here, I surely don't see the question mark. It's obvious that you were just pouncing on something that you thought was wrong. Nowhere do you state you are confused, or ask about what cigar was being reviewed. You posted in an insulting, condescending manner. You are clearly refuted on this point.

I dare anyone to prove that your first post was an honest and sincere effort to ascertain what cigar it was that I reviewed.

[SFG75]

Got me again Bill. What can I say? I just can't stop replying to you. You had me at hello. O.K., let's see if I can do this...where is that "ignore" feature again?....oh yeah...there it is..............




problem solved!. Now, I will PM a guy here about our successful box-split, as well as PM the two guys that I've traded with thus far over at HP.

[Purobrat]

SFG, your okay in my book!!