Torano Exodus 1959 torpedo

[SFG75]

The Torano website says one thing but many other cigar retailers list them very differently, most notably specifying "Gold"

However, that still doesn't negate the fact that I labeled the review correctly. You know how to label cigars and the Toranos do not? They are not mindful of things like confusing consumers?

Once again you are only proving to everyone here to be the true asshole that I maintain you are, please keep it up, again you only drive my point home with your shitty attitude and posts, just like on CigarPass

Switching the topic once again in a valiant effort to not answer any of the posted questions- still looking for an answer, though I doubt you'll answer them.

AnD yes, you were WRONG, just face it but again, in your little world you are never wrong now are you?

If I'm wrong, then the Toranos are wrong, and I doubt thats the case.

You still wanna maintain you were not wrong about anything you did on CigarPass or how you mistreated people on the Island of the Misfit Toys? What I have witnessed from you over and over again is a repeated pattern of your pigheadedness and smugness and complete refusal to ever admit you might be anything less than "F-L-A-W-L-E-S-S"

Still trying to switch the debate when the main one can't be settled to your liking. Sorry, you won't get me on the emotional hooks of name calling and site bashing.

[CoventryCat86]

However, that still doesn't negate the fact that I labeled the review correctly. You know how to label cigars and the Toranos do not? They are not mindful of things like confusing consumers?



Switching the topic once again in a valiant effort to not answer any of the posted questions- still looking for an answer, though I doubt you'll answer them.



If I'm wrong, then the Toranos are wrong, and I doubt thats the case.



Still trying to switch the debate when the main one can't be settled to your liking. Sorry, you won't get me on the emotional hooks of name calling and site bashing.

Answer to WHAT question? Speaking of answers to questions, you're famous for this. How many times have I asked you to back up the lies you posted when you tried to convince us all that your brother in law is the first guy to stand up and say something rather than avoid confrontation. I've asked you this on numerous occasions but you never answer the question.

Quite honestly, in all your bullshit, I'm at a loss as to what "questions" you are still looking for an answer to so please ask them again and I will answer them only after you provide examples backing up your claim that Randy IS NOT one to avoid controversy.

[SFG75]

Answer to WHAT question? Speaking of answers to questions, you're famous for this. How many times have I asked you to back up the lies you posted when you tried to convince us all that your brother in law is the first guy to stand up and say something rather than avoid confrontation. I've asked you this on numerous occasions but you never answer the question.

Quite honestly, in all your bullshit, I'm at a loss as to what "questions" you are still looking for an answer to so please ask them again and I will answer them only after you provide examples backing up your claim that Randy IS NOT one to avoid controversy.

Switching the topic yet again. You know darn well that my titling of the review was correct. If a person didn't know the difference, all they had to do was ask. It's the same when one doesn't know what BOTL or ISOM means. You ask and then you pick up the lingo. At least, that's what I learned. Once again, I'm using the Torano site to reference the cigars. That is the proper usage as a descriptor for the cigar in question. Re-read Hex's posts about it, it's clear for all to see.

[CoventryCat86]

Switching the topic yet again. You know darn well that my titling of the review was correct. If a person didn't know the difference, all they had to do was ask. It's the same when one doesn't know what BOTL or ISOM means. You ask and then you pick up the lingo. At least, that's what I learned. Once again, I'm using the Torano site to reference the cigars. That is the proper usage as a descriptor for the cigar in question. Re-read Hex's posts about it, it's clear for all to see.

I'm not switching the topic you asshole, YOU are. You said I'm not answering your "questions" and asked you to please post exactly WHAT questions you've asked that you claim I have not answered and the fact that you posted a lie about your brother in law and when I ask you to elaborate, you completely ignore me.

[SFG75]

I'm not switching the topic you asshole, YOU are. You said I'm not answering your "questions" and asked you to please post exactly WHAT questions you've asked that you claim I have not answered and the fact that you posted a lie about your brother in law and when I ask you to elaborate, you completely ignore me.

Here they are Bill, from a few pages ago when you referred to me as "delusional."

here are the questions:

1.)Hex "got it." He offered to do a box-split with anyone and posted this link : http://www.caminoviejo.com/store/ca...exodus-1959.htm Take a wild guess as to which cigar he knew I was referring to. Go ahead, take a guess......

i did assume it was the gold one because thats all i knew existed.

2.)Does Drake say that it is the gold or silver that he assumed I was talking about?

If the gold is the only one he assumed that existed, how does prove that he thought it was another cigar?

3.)Does Jaewing in his posts ever indicate that he thought I was talking about the silver?

[CoventryCat86]

here are the questions:

1.)Hex "got it." He offered to do a box-split with anyone and posted this link : http://www.caminoviejo.com/store/ca...exodus-1959.htm Take a wild guess as to which cigar he knew I was referring to. Go ahead, take a guess......


Quote:
i did assume it was the gold one because thats all i knew existed.


2.)Does Drake say that it is the gold or silver that he assumed I was talking about?

If the gold is the only one he assumed that existed, how does prove that he thought it was another cigar?

3.)Does Jaewing in his posts ever indicate that he thought I was talking about the silver?

Again, are you going to give me an answer to my question?

You first.......

Actually no, I tell ya what, I'll address your "questions"
1. Hex knew because he owns a small cigar retail operation that offers only a few lines of cigars where Carlos Torano is one of them. It's kind of like asking me a question about Jaguars where I will know more than 99.99% of the general population so of course he knew.
2. Drake knew AFTER reading the thread where Hex made the distinction that you did not so this is a moot point.
3. jaewing also knew AFTER reading the thread where Hex made the distinction so this is also a moot point.

Once again, puff's poll and other posts here show that others were also not clear on which cigar you were talking about until I pointed this out.

[SFG75]

Again, are you going to give me an answer to my question?

You first.......

No, that is off topic, unlike my questions.

here are the questions:

1.)Hex "got it." He offered to do a box-split with anyone and posted this link : http://www.caminoviejo.com/store/ca...exodus-1959.htm Take a wild guess as to which cigar he knew I was referring to. Go ahead, take a guess......


Quote:
i did assume it was the gold one because thats all i knew existed.


2.)Does Drake say that it is the gold or silver that he assumed I was talking about?

If the gold is the only one he assumed that existed, how does prove that he thought it was another cigar?

3.)Does Jaewing in his posts ever indicate that he thought I was talking about the silver?

Bill, you have picked a fight with me about the Torano title of my review. Have you done so due to your efforts to educate newbies? No, everyone here knows that you and I have a history and that this is nothing more than an opportunity(albeit a very small and inconsequential opportunity among others) to try and prove a point. Rather than let folks who have questions or concerns PM me or post it publicly, you have annointed yourself to speak for others. This matter is closed Bill. The simple fact is this. My titling of the review was correct-even the poll reflects that. If anyone was confused, they could've asked. I'm done with this thread. Good evening to you.

[CoventryCat86]

Let's make it simple Scotty, you posted this:

Switching the topic once again in a valiant effort to not answer any of the posted questions- still looking for an answer, though I doubt you'll answer them.

Now for the THIRD time, I respond with:

WHAT questions?

which I will gladly answer once you give me an answer to my question as to why you misrepresented Randy by saying he'd be the first one to stand up and say something (when you put a completely damaged cigar in his pass) when I maintain that he would be the LAST person to stand up and say something because he doesn't want to start a family feud over a stupid cigar.