Originally Posted by
jaewing
"neocons" "neopukes" "chickenhawk" ????
DVM . . . why don't you try to have an intelligent debate without name calling. It makes you look 12 years old. If you have to resort to calling names then you have lost the argument.
Thank you. Intelligent discourse needs to be well structured and compelling. Points should be made with either some direct evidence, or a reasonably reliable source. You are also completely entitled to express your opinion, but you should make sure and specify it is your opinion. You can accompany it with a description of the logical thought process that leads you to believe it as being true. Constant name calling and unsubstantiated statements presented as "God's Truth" do nothing but detract from your argument. It sounds like the kind of emotional speak used to incite a riot.
"some people are like slinkies, they're not really good for anything but they can bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs." –Unknown
"He did for bullshit what Stonehenge did for rocks." -Cecil Adams
Bookmarks