A being that is omnipotent, by its very definition, cannot have a limited existence. What you are saying is that a omnipotent being cannot exist... what i'm saying is that if one did exist, it would most certainly exist outside the limitations of time and space... We aren't discussing the plausibility of a 'God' here anyway, we are discussing evolution... the thing you're missing is that you can scream logic all you want, but some who believes in said God will continue to do so... you wont convince them otherwise, so the next best thing is to at least make them understand that science doesn't contradict religion... which it doesn't. Its really a very simple argument, and weather you believe or not, i would hope a person of science could at least understand what i'm saying here. At some point in the tracing back of evolution, there was nothing, and then, there was something... call it what you will, the big bang, the first day, whatever... the point is, many people on the religious side of things refuse to admit existence could have happened in any other way than what is described in the bible... but there is no reason what was described in the bible couldn't just be short hand for the entire big bang/evolution theory. If you get someone who believes in God to accept the Big bang theory, even if you have to add that God created the big bang to the beginning of the story... is it not a step in the right direction? Even you have to admit that you have to teach people how to read before you teach them the underlying themes in Shakespeare... Anyrate, your argument doesn't seem much more open minded than that of the extreme religious zealots... evidence or not, you're all just basing your argument on what someone else told you, no one knows for sure... and have you noticed yet that i was never arguing with you? my whole initial argument was about the narrow mindedness of an extremist religious argument...