sorry to ignore you bill...the "kinky" thing was taken from google....quite honestly bill,i didn't think it was that important to you....i don't care if kinky freidman wins ,loses,or opens a chain of kosher hot dog stands.....it was,obviously,important to you...
Corresponding Authority
No Sid, what's important to me is that you posted some wrong information and when I asked you to show evidence to back up your claim because I was fairly certain your facts were wrong based on what I found when I did a search on the subject, you never responded.Originally Posted by bigpoppapuff
Honestly, I would love to see where on "google" you found it because I searched the ole internet high and low and never found any polling evidence that Kinky Friedman was ever in 2nd place in that race.
Last edited by CoventryCat86; 10-23-2006 at 07:46 PM.
TBSCigars - "On Holiday"
Grammar - It's the difference between knowing your crap and knowing you're crap.
again,bill...it's not that big a deal to me...i'm sorry i didn't quote the article when i posted it....mea culpa,mea culpa......trust me..it was there..i c/p it....beyond that..it's a really old story...a lot like your constant badgering...
Corresponding Authority
Way to go Sid, this post is in the category of:
"I'm sorry but you're still an asshole."
And again, it is a big deal when you post something political and controversial as a fact and when you're asked to back it up you don't reply. You claimed the major parties were engaging in a smear campaign against Friedman and no one could find any evidence of that.
TBSCigars - "On Holiday"Grammar - It's the difference between knowing your crap and knowing you're crap.
Whipping Snappers!
Quiet, Bill - you're distracting Sid from ignoring us. Why do you have to keep bringing up his faux pas? So what - he said it and can't back it up - it's true - you just gotta trust him - it's true. And if it isn't, the thread will die in a few days and we can all forget about it, for cripes sake. Why are you CONSTANTLY confusing the issue with the facts?Way to go Sid, this post is in the category of:
"I'm sorry but you're still an asshole."
And again, it is a big deal when you post something political and controversial as a fact and when you're asked to back it up you don't reply. You claimed the major parties were engaging in a smear campaign against Friedman and no one could find any evidence of that.
Besides - Sid's busy putting a ban poll together for you and I because we threatened somewhere on this board - I don't know where - but somewhere - to have him do a ban poll for us - I think - at least that's what he said. Didn't he??? Yeah - I think he did... Somewhere... Or was that you that said something. Maybe it was Barry... No - I think it was Sid - yeah - it was Sid - and it was a threat!!! I'm sure of it!!!
Oh - and also - Sid's chasing asshats in another thread. You're so yesterday...
Last edited by ggiese; 10-23-2006 at 11:36 PM.
Senior Member
I vote we give Bill and Barry each a big shiny trophy 'cause they're both winners.With a gold star, too.
Oh, and by the way... no ban!!!
Edit: to see why I'm in such a generous mood... read today's smokes column.
<grin>
Last edited by designwise1; 10-24-2006 at 12:04 AM.
--Gerald
Senior Member
Why don't all you guys just kiss and make up? No one's gonna ban any of you. This whole thing is childish. No one is winning. You are past the point where anyone can come out a winner.I vote we give Bill and Barry each a big shiny trophy 'cause they're both winners.
Jesus! Didn't you guys used to like each other?
Whipping Snappers!
Hey, Sid - what's "i c/p it"? Not sure what that means...
Corresponding Authority
I think he means "cut and pasted" and since I'm usually pretty lousy at trying to find thing on the internet (I did try and couldn't find it at the time) I asked Sid to please provide the link to where he got it from. Come to think of it Sid, if you "c/p it" you should have provided WHERE you lifted if from so as not to let the readers think it was your own words.
I tried again to locate where Sid saw that and this time I was able to find it, word for word. Sure enough, it wasn't from a polliing company or a newspaper, it was from Kinky Friedman's website.For cryin' out loud Sid, that's NOT a credible place to get an unbiased story on what's really going on.
Now aren't we all shocked and amazed that Kinky would misrepresent the truth on his own website? I'm not, because it's politicians like him (who essentially lie) that give all of the rest of them a bad name.
At the time Sid made the post, Friedman was running fourth out of four candidates based on newspaper stories I was able to find at the time. Apparently there are actually five candidates in the race, Republican, a Libertarian, a Democrat, an Independent and Friedman (another independent)
As of today, I saw a comment on Kinky's own website where it was reported that Rasmussen (a highly respected and reputable polling company) has Friedman "way down."
Only 15 days left an then Friedman's bubble bursts as he finds himself losing this race.
Last edited by CoventryCat86; 10-24-2006 at 01:27 AM.
TBSCigars - "On Holiday"Grammar - It's the difference between knowing your crap and knowing you're crap.
Senior Member
For the record, I am not voting. I do not think Barry should be banned. Therefore, I will not vote to ban him. However, I will not vote "no ban" because I do not want for an instant anyone to think I in any way condone his statements, and by statements I DO NOT mean political affiliation.
Also I don't like the 90-day option. I thought 30 was the way we did it. 90 days is too long.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks